Why does a transnational #criminal law case end up before the #administrative courts? How little – if at all – is the administrative jurisdiction equipped to hear cases in which the plaintiff and applicant is in #extradition detention?<\/p>\n
Why do the principles of the #StPO not apply to the #VwGO in such cases?<\/p>\n
Why does the German state not want to and does not have to protect the #fundamental rights of an innocent German citizen violated by other #EU states under German law?<\/p>\n
Why do German administrative courts not recognize the #transcriminal significance of #ECJ case law?<\/p>\n
Perhaps because it would completely overhaul the #Federal Government’s plan to #reform the #IRG and “overturn” traditional (but incorrect) German legal views on the principles of transnational criminal law and would not fit into the political landscape?<\/p>\n
Prof. Dr. Otto #Lagodny, law firm partner Dr. Dr. Bernd J. Fehn and Prof. Dr. Dr. Karsten Fehn report on such a case in the July issue of #HRRS (from p. 246). In doing so, we have chosen a rather unusual method of presentation in the legal field. It is not a jurisprudential reappraisal (this has now taken up several hundred pages in the case file), but a deliberately subjective (and constitutionally combative) #case report with the title:<\/p>\n
Kafkaesque Reality<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Thoughts on a transnational case<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n from the perspective of those involved in the proceedings<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Nota bene: The client is now free and back in Germany after more than 2 years of #detention (!) due to other circumstances. If it had been up to the German government, he would have had to serve up to 385 years (!) of #imprisonment in the #USA as an #innocent here… The case is still pending at the #EGMR. We will continue to report…<\/p>\n Enjoy reading.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Why does a transnational #criminal law case end up before the #administrative courts? How little – if at all – is the administrative jurisdiction equipped to hear cases in which the plaintiff and applicant is in #extradition detention? Why do the principles of the #StPO not apply to the #VwGO in such cases? Why does […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":5333,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[46,48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5747","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog-en","category-criminal-law"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fehn-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5747","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fehn-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fehn-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fehn-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fehn-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5747"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fehn-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5747\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fehn-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5333"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fehn-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5747"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fehn-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5747"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fehn-legal.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5747"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}